
America's Secret War: How Washington Armed Both Sides
Apr 20, 2026
3 min read · Intermediate

The siege and recapture of the oil port city of Khorramshahr cost 14,000 lives and became a symbol of Iranian resistance. Yet the victory was hollow—the city lay in ruins.
The city of Khorramshahr, known to the Arabs as Mohammara, was one of the first prizes Iraq sought in its invasion of Iran. The siege that followed and Iran's eventual recapture made it one of the bloodiest urban battles of the twentieth century. By the time the city changed hands again in May 1982, approximately 14,000 soldiers had been killed.
When Iraqi forces invaded in September 1980, Khorramshahr was a logical first target. Located on the Shatt al-Arab waterway, it was Iran's primary oil export facility and home to one of the region's most important ports. The city had a population of around 370,000, most of whom fled as Iraqi forces advanced. Those who remained faced occupation, bombardment, and eventually, total war.
Iraqi forces under General Adnan Khairallah quickly surrounded the city and began a siege. Unlike rapid conventional warfare, where armies seek to outmaneuver each other across open ground, the siege of Khorramshahr became a grinding war of attrition. Iraqi artillery and aircraft pounded the city from a distance while infantry probed the defenses.
The Iranian defenders, a mixture of regular army units and Revolutionary Guard contingents, were poorly supplied but determined to hold the city. They built fortifications in the rubble, converted buildings into strongpoints, and prepared for a prolonged urban battle.
The siege lasted from September 1980 to May 1982—nearly twenty months of continuous combat. It was characterized by small-unit tactics, house-to-house fighting, and the constant threat of death from sniper fire, artillery, and air attack. Supplies to the defenders were minimal; at points, they were reduced to eating uncooked grain and canned food scavenged from stores.
The human cost mounted relentlessly. Iraqi commanders preferred artillery bombardment to infantry assaults, pounding the city into rubble. Iranian defenders held neighborhood by neighborhood, trading space for time as they inflicted casualties on attacking Iraqi forces.
By early 1982, with spring rains making reinforcement and supply even more difficult, Iranian commanders made the decision to recapture the city. In May 1982, Iranian forces launched a major offensive operation called Operation Khaybar. The assault involved human wave tactics and was supported by artillery and air power.
The counterattack worked. Iraqi forces, depleted by months of siege warfare and facing a major Iranian offensive, began to withdraw from the city. On May 24, 1982, Iranian forces entered Khorramshahr. The victory was total but purchased at an extraordinary cost.
Khorramshahr became something more than a city in Iranian memory—it became a symbol of resistance and sacrifice. The name itself was invoked in propaganda: the city of blood, the city that had been recaptured, proof that revolutionary fervor and willingness to die could overcome superior Iraqi firepower.
For Saddam's government, the loss of Khorramshahr was a bitter disappointment. The military campaign had failed to achieve its objectives. Iraqi forces, despite initial numerical advantage and air superiority, had been unable to hold conquered territory against determined Iranian resistance.
The siege and recapture of Khorramshahr taught both armies hard lessons about urban warfare. Firepower and equipment mattered less in the confined space of a city than in open field warfare. Morale, unit cohesion, and willingness to sustain casualties became paramount. Neither side could easily overwhelm the other through superior technology or tactics.
For military theorists observing the war, Khorramshahr raised uncomfortable questions. If an army with superior training, equipment, and firepower could be ground down in urban combat by a more poorly equipped but more motivated opponent, what did that mean for military strategy in an age of asymmetric warfare?
The city itself was left devastated. Large sections had been reduced to rubble. The port facilities were destroyed. The oil refinery was damaged beyond immediate repair. It would take years for Khorramshahr to recover economically, if it ever fully recovered. The symbolic victory of recapturing the city came at a price that the Iranian economy could ill afford.
Journal of Military History, 2001
U.S. Military Academy, 1990
Middle Eastern Studies, 2003
Continue Reading