The High-Explosive Anti-Tank round exploits the Munroe effect to punch through armor with a focused jet of metal — not a projectile. From WWII bazookas to modern ATGMs, this physics changed armored warfare forever.
In the mid-1930s, a Swiss chemist named Henry Mohaupt was experimenting with shaped explosive charges when he made an observation that would reshape armored warfare. He found that a hollow cavity at the face of an explosive charge, lined with a thin metal cone, dramatically concentrated the force of the detonation into a focused, high-velocity jet of metal particles. The phenomenon — known as the Munroe effect after American chemist Charles Munroe, who had observed a related principle in 1888 — was not new. Its weaponized application was.
The result was the High-Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) warhead: an ammunition type that could defeat tank armor not through kinetic energy and mass, as conventional armor-piercing rounds did, but through focused hydrodynamic penetration. A HEAT round with a warhead diameter of 75mm could defeat armor that a solid steel shot of the same diameter could not. More importantly, its penetration capability was independent of velocity — meaning it could be fired from light, short-barreled weapons that no conventional anti-tank gun could replicate.
The implications were immediate and lasting. HEAT technology made anti-tank capability portable, gave infantry a genuine countermeasure to tanks, and triggered a decades-long arms race between armor protection and shaped charge penetration that continues into the twenty-first century.
The Munroe effect works through a mechanism that seems counterintuitive: the HEAT warhead does not shoot a solid projectile through armor. Instead, the detonation of the main explosive charge collapses the metal liner (typically copper) at velocities of 8–10 kilometers per second, forming a coherent jet of metal particles moving at the tip at velocities of up to 10 km/s. This jet behaves hydrodynamically — both the jet and the armor plate it strikes deform like liquids under the extreme pressures involved (on the order of 10–100 gigapascals).
The penetration depth is determined primarily by the length and density of the jet and by the diameter of the warhead (which governs the jet's diameter and coherence). Standoff distance — the gap between the warhead face and the armor plate — matters critically: the jet must be fully formed before it strikes, requiring a minimum standoff but also degrading if the standoff is too long. This physics created the entire category of standoff fuze design that would preoccupy munitions engineers for the following eight decades.
Critically, velocity of the weapon platform at launch has essentially no effect on penetration. A HEAT round fired from a 100 m/s rocket achieves the same armor penetration as one fired from a 900 m/s gun, assuming identical warhead geometry. This single fact changed the economics of anti-tank warfare.
The Germans were among the first to develop weaponized shaped charges, fielding the Hohlladungsgranate (hollow-charge grenade) types by 1940. American and British development accelerated after observing German equipment captured in North Africa. The American M1 Bazooka, introduced in 1942, fired a 60mm HEAT rocket capable of penetrating approximately 100mm of homogeneous armor — sufficient against early- and mid-war German armor, though increasingly marginal against later vehicles.
The German Panzerfaust, introduced in 1943, was the most radical simplification: a cheap, single-shot, disposable launcher firing a large HEAT warhead. Panzerfaust variants could penetrate 140–220mm of armor depending on model — enough to kill any Allied tank of the period at close range. Production of Panzerfausts reached approximately 6.7 million units by the end of the war, according to German ordnance records compiled by Ian Hogg in his survey of German infantry weapons. They were issued to teenage Volkssturm conscripts in the war's final months and remained effective against Shermans and T-34s.
The Panzerfaust could be produced for approximately 25 Reichsmarks — roughly the cost of two artillery shells. The tank it was designed to destroy cost hundreds of thousands of Reichsmarks. The HEAT round inverted the cost-effectiveness equation of anti-tank warfare.
The Soviet RPG-43 and RPG-6 grenades similarly used shaped charges. By 1944–45, virtually every major belligerent had fielded portable HEAT weapons that gave infantry a credible anti-armor capability at close range.
The HEAT warhead's dominance was not unchallenged. The standoff fuze requirement — the fact that the warhead needs physical contact to detonate the shaped charge — created an obvious countermeasure: keep the warhead away from the main armor. Spaced armor (a secondary outer plate mounted away from the primary armor) became the first response, causing premature detonation of HEAT warheads before the jet reached full formation distance to the main plate.
The German Schurzen side skirts, added to Panzer IV tanks from 1943, were an early application: wire mesh or thin plate designed to trigger infantry anti-tank rockets (bazookas, PIAT, and similar weapons) before they reached the hull. The concept was effective against simple HEAT warheads but required increasingly sophisticated designs as warhead technology improved.
The development of explosive reactive armor (ERA) in the 1970s — pioneered by Israeli engineers after the Yom Kippur War and widely adopted from the 1980s — represented the most effective passive countermeasure: blocks of explosive material on the tank's exterior that detonate outward when struck by a HEAT jet, disrupting the jet's coherence. The Soviet T-55 and T-62 series, heavily losses to Egyptian and Israeli HEAT weapons in 1973, were subsequently fitted with ERA as a direct response.
The anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) of the Cold War era — the American TOW, Soviet Sagger and Kornet, French Milan — all used HEAT warheads, but launched from standoff distances of 1,000–4,000 meters rather than the close ranges of WWII. This extended the reach of infantry anti-armor capability dramatically, making tank operations in exposed terrain extremely hazardous against equipped opponents.
The response to ERA-equipped targets was the tandem warhead: a HEAT round with a small precursor charge designed to detonate the ERA block and clear it away before the main warhead's jet arrives a fraction of a millisecond later. Tandem HEAT warheads are standard in current-generation ATGMs including the American TOW-2B and Russian Kornet-EM.
The interaction between shaped charge technology and armor protection continues to evolve. The Russian T-72 and T-80 series tanks field composite Kontakt-5 ERA that defeats some tandem warheads. The American M1A2 and German Leopard 2 use classified composite and ceramic armor packages designed specifically to disrupt HEAT jet formation. Trophy and Arena active protection systems — radar-guided countermeasures that shoot down incoming ATGMs before they reach the tank — represent the most recent layer of the HEAT/armor competition.
Mohaupt's observation in the 1930s opened an arms race that eight decades of engineering have not resolved. The physics of the shaped charge remain exactly as he found them; it is the engineering around them — in both attack and defense — that has grown to extraordinary complexity.
Arms and Armour Press, 1976
Random House, 2013
US Army Research Laboratory Technical Report, 1993
From the first armed Predator strike in 2001 to the drone swarms over Ukraine in 2023, unmanned aerial systems have transformed modern warfare faster than any previous technology since the airplane itself.
Between 1922 and 1942, the aircraft carrier evolved from an experimental concept to the dominant naval weapon. The question of why the battleship was displaced in twenty years is one of the most important in naval history.
The tank was invented in 1916 to solve a specific tactical problem: how to cross No Man's Land under machine gun fire. A century later, the question of whether the tank has a future on the modern battlefield is genuinely open.
